- Born
- 14 December 1937
Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia - Occupation
- Aboriginal activist, Women's rights activist, Public servant, Film maker and Academic
- Alternative Names
- Anderson, Pat (maiden name)
Summary
In 1972 Pat Eatock became the first Aboriginal to stand for Federal Parliament in the ACT. She participated in the Aboriginal Embassy and Women's Liberation in 1972. In 1973 she became the first non-matriculated mature aged student at the ANU, graduating as a Bachelor of Arts in 1977. In 1975 she attended the 1975 Women in Politics Conference and the International Women's Year World Conference in Mexico City. She has worked as a public servant, university lecturer, and established and managed the Perleeka Aboriginal Television, producing films for community television and training Aboriginal film makers from 1992-96.




I am so pleased she is sueing Andrew Bolt. I used to work at Warriappendi alternative school in Adelaide, teaching music. It's insulting and repulsive to read his ridiculous comments in our newspapers and on internet everyday. We've got enough problems with ignorance and racism in this country without 'journalists' pouring fuel all over it and inciting hatred. Congratulations! Go for it girl...
Jimbo - 24 September 2010, 10:26 AM EST
So why don't you bother reading wha†he actually said, before dripping your pen in so much posion ?
This is what Bolt said..
I’m not saying any of those I’ve named chose to be Aboriginal for anything but the most heartfelt and honest of reasons. I certainly don’t accuse them of opportunism'
So what is your problem ?
No doubt Pat's extreme Left wing views don't come into this at all ... do they ?
Penny Black - 29 March 2011, 2:29 PM EST
Bolt may be an idiot and be guilty of publishing his offensive point of view for all the world to see, but doesn't he have the right in a democratic country that believes in freedom of speech to do so? Whether you agree with the man or not, isn't it your right to choose what you wish to read and think and not have some higher power choose for you? People's right to freedom of speech is more important than a minority's right to not be offended by the written word. The case against Andrew Bolt is not an attack on his politics or personal views but an attack against our freedom of speech and on Democracy itself. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding themselves.
Chris Lay - 28 September 2011, 3:27 PM EST
And now Andrew Bolt has been found "guilty". Of what? In my 60 years, I have met many people, including those who describe themselves as aboriginal. I respect that. But there were two who identified all the extra benefits they get because of claiming technical aboriginality - and they're as white and non-aborigianl in culture as any European. Persuing Andrew Bolt has done nothing but bring a strong focus on so-called aboriginals. Interesting that although monetary damages were sought, none were awarded. I love & respect everyone - until or if they give me cause not to. Ms Eatock et al have given me reason not to.
Barney Reynolds - 29 September 2011, 9:51 AM EST
Pat Eatock is a well repected and loved Aboriginal leader in her own community as well as nationally. She is as Aboriginal as any other Aboriginal person. Andrew Bolt decided she was not Aboriginal and had dedicated her life to the stuggle of her people for personal gain. This was found to be his motive by the courts and he was wrong on both countrs. I would love to see any of authors making negative comment here walk a mile in Pat's shoes. May I suggest you read the judgement carefully, understand why it is not against freedom of speech and then why we all need to be protected from shoddy journalism.
Vich - 30 September 2011, 6:30 PM EST